JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 5, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Jose Ignacio Duran Cuellar·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela En Proceso Divisorio Y De Rendicion De Cuentas Contra Tribunal Superior
  • Carga de la prueba
  • Confirma cumplimiento de sentencia T-743/08 al tramitar nuevamente incidente de reconocimiento de mejoras
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-743/08.

El memorialista solicita a la Sala de Revisión garantizar el cumplimiento de la sentencia de la referencia, bajo el argumento de que el juzgado Treinta Civil Del Circuito de Bogotá no atendió lo dispuesto en ella.

La Sala por su parte considera que el Juzgado aludido si dio cumplimiento a lo ordenado en el fallo al haber dado nuevamente trámite al incidente de reconocimiento de mejoras dentro del proceso divisorio y en tal sentido considera que no es viable atender positivamente la solicitud de cumplimiento.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el cumplimiento de la sentencia T-743 de 2008, proferida por la Sala Segunda de Revisión.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR copia del presente auto al peticionario de la solicitud de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.